Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Colley v. Nessel et al
as 2:2024cv10952
Petitioner:
Lawrence Lee Colley
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, Catherine Bauman, Hubble and others
CARNEAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LEE CARNEAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lawrence v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lee Lawrence and Lawrence Lee
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Elmore v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Elmore
Defendant:
Officer Allen and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Day et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Green and Lawrence Lee Green
Defendant:
S Day and DHB Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04762
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LEE INKS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Lawrence Azbell
as 22-12890
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE LEE AZBELL
Hall v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Hall
Defendant:
Ms. Jordan, Mosher, Splan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
