Cases 1 - 10 of 20
THOMAS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv04473
Petitioner:
DARRON THOMAS
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER, DEPUTY WARDEN LAWRY and FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIGARO v. PISTRO et al
as 2:2021cv02346
Defendant:
R. WILLIAMS, MRS. KNOX, DEPUTY SUPT SHANNON and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VINES v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, SEAN MARLER, ALEXIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. VINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGARO v. PISTRO et al
as 1:2021cv08968
Defendant:
R. WILLIAMS, LT. SHANNON, MR. PISTRO and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN FIGARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01397
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN PETE LAWRIE, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
VACHO SHAHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Lawrie et al
as 2:2020cv04576
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
THOMAS LAWRIE and Jules Quartapella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Lawrie et al
as 4:2020cv01689
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
Thomas Lawrie and Jules Quartapella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv22003
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A. INC., MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP LAWRY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv00698
Plaintiff:
PERRY L. LAWRY
Defendant:
RONALD WILLIAMS , PETER MENDINCINO and CITY OF NEW CASTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
