Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Caldwell v. Carroll et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll, FNU Adkins and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lin et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Lai Luo Lin and Yuk Suen Lin
Defendant:
Bing Kai Chen, Yi Yu Chen and Xiang Fong Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frank Douglas Hall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Douglas Hall, Christopher Alphonse Jones, Dennis Edward Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Lau v. Ke
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
LAI LAU
Defendant:
BIN KE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Lai Cheong v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kenny Lai Cheong
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Lincoln Property Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pittman v. Moss et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
FNU Moss, FNU Kinder and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
January Crews-Sanchez v. Frito Lay, Inc.
as 22-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANUARY CREWS-SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FRITO LAY, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
