Cases 1 - 10 of 38
MOSELEY v. BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MOSELEY
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, BAY COUNTY FLORIDA, SCOTT MICHEAL THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bagatelos et al v. Umpqua Bank
as 3:2023cv02759
Plaintiff:
Peter A Bagatelos, Anne M. H. Bagatelos, Karen C. Bagatelos and others
Defendant:
Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DAVIS et al v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03410
Plaintiff:
TARA DAVIS and LEE ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00231
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Lee Vaughn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee A. Davis v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00112
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Davis
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee A. Davis v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 8:2019cv02314
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Davis, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Sherri K. McElroy (Deceased) and Lee A. Davis
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson and Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee Davis, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 19-11000
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEE ERNEST DAVIS, JR.
Davis v. Davis
as 2:2019cv00031
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Lee Vaughn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Turner
as 1:2017cv05711
Defendant:
Kimberly Turner
Plaintiff:
Lee Ester Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
