Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Davidson v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv00432
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Neven
Petitioner:
Lee Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26000
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Octavia Davidson and Harry Lee Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. State of New York
as 11-4110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Lee Davidson
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Ricenberg, Correction Officer, Downstate Superintendant and George Nation, Inmate gangs old time corrections directions location to parole
Davidson v. New York State/Into New York
as 11-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Davidson, AKA Lee Davidson, AKA Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State/Into New York City Parole
Davidson v. Pigg et al
as 2:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Davidson, II
Defendant:
Michael Pigg and Donna Fanning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Springer et al
as 2:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Davidson, II
Defendant:
Rick Springer, Jeffrey McGuire, Barry Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Independent - New York et al
as 1:2010cv01054
Plaintiff:
William Lee Davidson
Defendant:
Independent - New York, Ricenberg and George Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lori Davidson, et al v. Government Employees Insurance
as 10-15510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORI ANN DAVIDSON and STEVEN LEE DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
:
SERVICE
Davidson v. Kohn et al
as 2:2009cv01417
Plaintiff:
Lee Davidson
Defendant:
Philip J. Kohn and Craig F. Jorgenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Kohn et al
as 2:2009cv01358
Plaintiff:
Lee Davidson
Defendant:
Philip J. Kohn and Craig F. Jorgenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
