Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MOULTRIE v. KELLY et al
as 3:2021cv04036
Defendant:
CHARLES LEE MOULTRIE, JR, PATRICIA D KELLY and JOHN A FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOULTRIE v. PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 3:2021cv01052
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE MOULTRIE, JR
Defendant:
PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT and PATRICK D KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Moultrie v. Reynolds
as 9:2015cv00198
Petitioner:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Respondent:
NFN Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley Lee Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD and others
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Moultrie v. Byars et al
as 9:2014cv01690
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Defendant:
William Byars, Jr , Bryan P Stirling , Nikki Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. Williams et al
as 0:2011cv02333
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Defendant:
Paul Shane Williams, Andre Massey, John Paul Difalco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. Morgan County Jail et al
as 3:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Moultrie, Jr.
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail and Sharon Vance
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.