Cases 1 - 10 of 88
VAUGHN-JANSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13106
Plaintiff:
DYLAN LEE VAUGHN-JANSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02841
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00683
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vaughn v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
John Lee Vaughn
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathon Moseley v. Robert Vaughn, Jr.
as 21-2252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MR. JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LEE VAUGHN, JR., SOLUTION PAINTING, INC., Has been represented by attorney Robert Vaughn and JUDGE RICHARD E. GARDINER
Jonathon Moseley v. Robert Vaughn, Jr.
as 21-2026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MR. JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LEE VAUGHN, JR., SOLUTION PAINTING, INC., Has been represented by attorney Robert Vaughn and JUDGE RICHARD E. GARDINER
Jonathon Moseley v. Robert Vaughn, Jr.
as 21-1673
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LEE VAUGHN, JR., SOLUTION PAINTING, INC., Has been represented by attorney Robert Vaughn and JUDGE RICHARD E. GARDINER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MR. JONATHON ALDEN MOSELEY
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00231
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Lee Vaughn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughn v. Underwood
as 3:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Jamie Underwood
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
