Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Guyton v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tyreese Guyton
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Russ Olmstead, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LELO Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
LELO Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Trade Representative and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lelo v. Lelo et al
as 2:2018cv03454
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lelo
Defendant:
Gigi Lelo , Helda Rock and 1059 Abbot Blvd., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lelo v. Lelo et al
as 1:2017cv06922
Defendant:
1059 Abbot Blvd., LLC, Gigi Lelo and Helda Rock
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TZU Technologies, LLC v. Lelo, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01952
Defendant:
Lelo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
TZU Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USA v. Aurelio Olmedo-Monte
as 17-50269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AURELIO OLMEDO-MONTES, also known as Lelo Montes, also known as Juan Monteroz-Montez, also known as Adrian Montez, also known as Adrian Montes, also known as Adrian Montes-McCrary, also known as Aurelio Olmedo Montes, also known as Lelo Montez, also known
Standard Innovation Corporation v. LELOi AB et al
as 5:2015cv04858
Defendant:
Lelo (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Armocon Technology Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Standard Innovation Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Lelo, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61154
Plaintiff:
Shipping and Transit, LLC
Defendant:
Lelo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
