Cases 1 - 10 of 87
LEMEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15638
Plaintiff:
DARREN KENT LEMEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace v. Nooth et al
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adam Wallace
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, David Pedro, Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Yang et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Henry
Defendant:
CO David Yang and Kathy Lemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemen v. Redwire Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv01254
Plaintiff:
JED LEMEN
Defendant:
REDWIRE CORPORATION, PETER CANNITO, WILLIAM READ and others
LEMEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58649
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD LEMEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRAY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00261
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
LEMEN STANLEY MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEMEN v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
TOM RAY LEMEN
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH, JOHN DOE, WAL-MART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Matthews v. J. Taylor, et al
as 20-36008
Defendant / Appellee:
T. CHASE, Prescriber at EOCI, H. RILEY, Case Manager at EOCI, N. SOBOTTA, Grievance coordinator at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Johnson v. Utter
as 2:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Jean Lutsey, John Does 1-4, Sue Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Dewhite Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
