Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ceballos-Germosen et al v. Doctor's Hospital Center Manati et al
as 3:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ceballos-Germosen
Defendant:
Doctor's Hospital Center Manati , Jose De Leon-Collazo , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia-Bidot et al v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
Trina E. Garcia-Bidot and G.M.G.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, United States of America, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceballos-Germosen et al v. Ortiz-Cotty et al
as 3:2014cv01217
Plaintiff:
Enrique Ceballos-Germosen , Fremia Ceballos-Germosen and Maysa Ceballos-Germosen
Defendant:
Wilson Ortiz-Cotty, Conjugal Partnership Ortiz-Doe, Companies A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vandarrel Doe v. USA
as 10-12893
Petitioner - Appellant:
VANDARREL LEON DOE
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Grau-Alvarez et al
as 3:2009cv01451
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Miguel A. Grau-Alvarez, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Grau-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Popular Auto, Inc. v. M/V La Marioneta, et al
as 3:2009cv01248
Plaintiff:
Popular Auto, Inc., Popular Auto, Inc. and Popular Auto, Inc.
Defendant:
M/V La Marioneta, Rene Leon-Nieves, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe v. United States Of America
as 6:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
Vandarrel Leon Doe
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sossamon v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2007mc00003
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Archie Scarborough, Bo Whitiker, Chuck Baker and others
Luttrell v. Demo et al
as 4:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Luttrell
Defendant:
Paul Demo, Daniel Fernandez and Leon Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
