Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vanaman v. Werner et al
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant:
Katherine Werner, James Hayden, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vanaman v. Maerk et al
as 4:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant:
Unknown Maerk, Unknown Diaz, Unknown Stangl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanaman v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00485
Petitioner:
Leslie Grey Vanaman
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Leslie Vanaman v. Christopher Marlow, et al
as 21-15645
Defendant / Appellee:
MITCHELL, Unknown; legal assistant to Ms. Talpelcido at USP Tucson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAWSON, Unknown; Lieutenant who directs officers at USP Tucson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE GREY VANAMAN
Leslie Vanaman v. Molinar, et al
as 21-15260
Defendant / Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, MOLINAR, R. L. RHODES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE GREY VANAMAN
FISHER v. CASTLEBERRY et al
as 2:2019cv02659
Defendant:
EVERETT GILLISON, THEODORE JOHNSON, AUDREY DONALD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
