Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SHELTON v. LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.
as 2:2022cv02232
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Germain-Cummings v. Liberty University
as 4:2022cv40036
Plaintiff:
Paul Germain-Cummings
Defendant:
Liberty University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Crystal Rivers v. United States of America
as 21-2408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL VL RIVERS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, BILL TALBOTT, VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION and others
Defendant:
KAREN DEER, MARYLOU PRILLIMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Eva Palmer v. Liberty University, Inc.
as 21-2390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVA PALMER
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INCORPORATED
Crystal Rivers v. United States of America
as 21-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRYSTAL VL RIVERS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, BILL TALBOTT, VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION and others
Defendant:
KAREN DEER, MARYLOU PRILLIMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Elleby v. Liberty University
as 5:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Liberty University
Plaintiff:
Joerella Elleby
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1162
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-2290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christine Owen v. Liberty University
as 20-1596
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC CAMDEN, LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, ELIAS MOITINHO, both individually and in his official capacity as Liberty University CES faculty and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE M. OWEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
