Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Hardy et al
as 2:2016cv02063
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Defendant:
Linda Hardy, James Johnson, Estate of Helen Wise Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv10089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2012cv01836
Plaintiff:
Linda Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hardy v. Belk Inc
as 8:2011cv01764
Plaintiff:
Linda Hardy
Defendant:
Belk Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2009cv00928
Plaintiff:
Linda Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hardy v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Linda Hardy and Linda Hardy
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Asay et al v. Dare to Dream Investments et al
as 2:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Marylee Asay, Christopher Teem, Bernece Teem and others
Defendant:
Dare to Dream Investments, Transfrom America Mortgage, Brandon Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardy v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 7:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Linda Hardy
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company and American United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Williams v. Hardy et al
as 1:2007cv09752
Plaintiff:
Gary Williams
Defendant:
Linda Hardy and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
