Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LifeVoxel.AI Inc. et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel.AI Inc., AI Visualize Inc., Kovey Kovalan and others
Defendant:
Amjad Khan, Ethan Brown, BROWN NERI SMITH & KHAN LLP and others
LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC et al v. Marschall et al
as 3:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC, Scott Marschall, Debbie Gallo and others
Defendant:
LifeVoxel.AI, Inc., Kovey Kovalan and Linh Le
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Karrie Locher, LLC v Le
as 4:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Karrie Locher, LLC
Defendant:
Tuan Linh Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC, Scott Marschall, Debbie Gallo and others
Defendant:
LifeVoxel.AI, Inc., Kovey Kovalan and Linh Le
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Thoughtful Media Group, Inc. et al v. Ingrouille et al
as 2:2018cv03303
Defendant:
Mark Ingrouille and Ngoc Linh Le
Plaintiff:
Thoughtful Media Group, Inc.
Movant:
Tran Trung
Le v. Geico Casualty Company
as 2:2017cv01819
Defendant:
Geico Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
My-Linh Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Le v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00975
Plaintiff:
Linh Le
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Le v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012at00496
Plaintiff:
Linh Le
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
