Cases 41 - 50 of 152
MICKLES v. MANNER et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
LISA MANNER, AARON REYNOLDS, DARYL D. SOUTPAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GATLIN v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
JERELLE GATLIN
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROCK v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
CLYDE BROCK
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2022cv01736
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEVENS
Defendant:
LISA HAMBLEN, REGAL, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES v. ROMONOV et al
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
JOSH ROMONOV, LISA MANNER, HELINA PRIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLLIDAY v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
TERRYON M. GOLLIDAY
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLES FUNK, BILL JOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L GREER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, AARON SMITH, LISA HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
HERBERT E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER et al
as 1:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER, DR. PIERCE, DR. MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANTON v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH C.J. BLANTON
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DAN MITCHELL, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
