Cases 1 - 10 of 298
HESAI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
HESAI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and HESAI INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and LAURA D. TAYLOR-KALE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
William Jones v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, The Honorable, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense, Defense Contract Management Agency, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lisle v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Loreen L. Lisle
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank D. Whitworth, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WHITLOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E WHITLOCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Christine Wormuth, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
