Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. USA
as 6:2023cv06087
Petitioner:
Redmon Logan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Logan v. Ryason et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Victoria Ryason, Rondall P Jones, Law Enforcement Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brainerd v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Peco Foods Inc
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Logan Hamilton
Defendant:
Peco Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Fair Labor Standards
Bowles v. Logan et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowles
Defendant:
John Logan and Logan Real Estate Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
