Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Lonas, Dessie v. Oshkosh Corrections Inst. et al
as 3:2016cv00752
Plaintiff:
Dessie Russell Lonas
Defendant:
Oshkosh Corrections Inst. and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dessie Lonas v. William Griesbach
as 16-1757
Petitioner:
DESSIE R. LONAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
Lonas v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Dessie Russell Lonas
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lonas v. Johnson
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Dessie Russell Lonas
Defendant:
Dana Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonas v. Bischel et al
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Dessie Russell Lonas
Defendant:
Sue Bischel, Donald Zuidmulder, Dana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonas v State of Wisconsin
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Dessie Russell Lonas
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonas v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Dessie Lonas
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Chicago Park District et al
as 1:2015cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Park District, Bryan Traubert, Avis LaVelle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
