Cases 21 - 30 of 38
US v. Devon Lunn
as 17-4138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEVON LONA LUNN, a/k/a Devon Lunn Goodwin
Elizabeth Lona v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70329
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH LONA, AKA Lisa Elizabeth Lona, AKA Lisa Luna, AKA Chata Monkiker
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Rabang et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Margretty Rabang , Olive Oshiro , Dominador Aure and others
Defendant:
Robert Kelly, Jr, Rick D George, Agripina Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Dessie Lonas v. William Griesbach
as 16-1757
Petitioner:
DESSIE R. LONAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH
PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01207
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION, INC. , AAMIR TRANS., INC. , AANYIA TRANS., INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
United States v. Lona Lee Colhoff
as 15-2800
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lona Lee Colhoff
Wipf et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-02020
Plaintiff:
Nolan J. Wipf , Nolan Wipf Farm , Sprecher Bros. Livstk and Grain Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Agnew et al v. U.S. Airways et al
as 2:2014cv00415
Defendant:
U.S. Airways , Lona Hart and David Mackaig
Plaintiff:
Ezell Agnew and Tonya Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lamontagne v. Runyon et al
as 8:2013cv01948
Plaintiff:
David P. Lamontagne, Sr.
Defendant:
James C. Runyon, Frederick W. Heath , A.C.T.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Lapins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18953
Plaintiff:
Lona Lapins and Sorrell Lapins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Coloplast Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
