Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Williams v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Republic Telecom Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00274
Defendant:
Republic Telecom Services, Inc. and Luis Lorenzo Barrios
Plaintiff:
Niesha S Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ladiner v. Lowery et al
as 2:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Dean Minor, The Municipality of Randolph County in Moberly, Missouri, Anne Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Ladiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Bryan et al
as 6:2020cv03032
Defendant:
Breasia Sessoms, Jason Bourcier, Marcus Robison and others
Plaintiff:
Mason Ibra Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Great Circle Missouri
as 4:2019cv00614
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lawson
Defendant:
Great Circle Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Escobar et al v. Rennert et al
as 4:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bertha Acuna Escobar , Jacqueline Magali Acuna Ibaceta , Rosa Marilyn Aguirre Medina and others
Defendant:
The Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyons v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03462
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, USMCFP Springfield Administration, Inspector General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo T. Jackson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lyons v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03074
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, J Grondolsky, FMC Devens Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winters v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00899
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
