Cases 1 - 10 of 879
Molina-Salvador v. Garland
as 24-2904
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO MOLINA-SALVADOR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alberto Calderon v. Garland
as 24-2619
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Green v. Perard et al
as 8:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Arthur Green, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronje William Baptist Perard, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia #331925 v. Duarte et al
as 2:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Garcia, II
Defendant:
Unknown Duarte and Unknown Atundo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia #331925 v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Garcia, II
Defendant:
Unknown Young, Unknown Reyes, Unknown Kamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tepepa et al v. The Ribbon Worldwide 44 LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
Jose Faria, Laidi Elkouas, Gabriel Tepepa and others
Defendant:
THE RIBBON WORLDWIDE 44 LLC d/b/a BACALLS RESTAURANT, Kenneth Sturm and The Ribbon Worldwide 44 LLC doing business as Bacall's Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO RAMIREZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Ordonez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1263
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO LOPEZ-ORDONEZ, JULIA ALICIA SAY-ESTRADA, DASHA GISSEL LOPEZ-SAY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
