Cases 11 - 20 of 685
Stacy Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2346
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv25127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Bruce Johnston v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RYAN BRANDT, SHAWN BURKE, KEVIN PARNELLA and others
Defendant:
EDLAB ENVIRONMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS LABORATORY, JOHN DOES, 1-300, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as DOES 1-100 inclusive and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Appellant:
BRICE M. JOHNSTON
Kappel v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.,
as 1:2020cv02825
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carla J Kappel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kappel v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.,
as 1:2020cv05123
Plaintiff:
Carla J Kappel
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaudhary et al v. Lumber Liquidator, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02824
Plaintiff:
Omran Chaudhary and Qudsia Awan
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidator, Inc. and Does One through Ten, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newsome v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01319
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Newsome
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Fraunfelter v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02824
Plaintiff:
Erin Lynn Fraunfelter
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02823
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stacy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
