Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.
as 17-1960
:
In re: KBR, INCORPORATED, Burn Pit Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744, PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744, JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT, LLC, HALLIBURTON COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERKA LTD
US v. Antoine Lundy
as 17-6994
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTOINE DEMETRIUS LUNDY, a/k/a Buff
United States of America v. Lundy et al
as 1:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis Lundy, Sarah Lundy and South Carolina Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Lundy v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2016cv02596
Plaintiff:
Rachel M Lundy
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dustin Wilson v. Lieutenant Tincher
as 16-6559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN CHASE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TINCHER, SERGEANT LUNDY, WARDEN WRIGHT and others
Bates v. Lundy Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Bates
Defendant:
Lundy Motors, LLC, Wynn's Extended Care, Inc., National Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lundy v. USA
as 2:2016cv00038
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antoine Demetrius Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
H. Laskey v. City of Baltimore
as 15-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. LEIGHTON LASKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BALTIMORE, MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, LAW DEPT. FOR THE CITY OF BALTIMORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
