Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wareka v. Luxe Eyes Spa LLC
as 2:2026cv04483
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Luxe Eyes Spa LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Luxe Homecare, Inc. v. Kennedy Jr.
as 2:2026cv06912
Petitioner:
Luxe Homecare, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
SULASKI v. LUX
as 2:2026cv00442
Petitioner:
JEFFREY SULASKI
Respondent:
D. LUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03186
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Davide Olivieri
as 26-1783
Plaintiff:
DESIGN GAPS, INC. and DAVID GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVIDE OLIVIERI, DORIANA OLIVIERI, DD LUXE DESIGN, LLC and others
Lux Veritatis E.E. Trust et al v. Wayne Service Inc et al
as 2:2026cv11960
Plaintiff:
Lux Veritatis E.E. Trust and Nicholas David Paul Sedlock
Defendant:
Wayne Service Inc, Tera Jackson-Davis, J. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01753
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01061
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Nifty Home Products Inc v. Ladynana U.S., et al
as 26-2289
Plaintiff:
NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS INC
Defendant:
LADYNANA U.S., ALL4UGOOD, CARB OMAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
