Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Merriman v. Lizarraga et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff: Dominique Merriman
Defendant: J. Lizarraga, James Telander, Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Language Testing International et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff: Lyman Hopkins
Defendant: Language Testing International and Diane Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lyman v. Arpaio
as 2:2016cv00943
Plaintiff: Alexandro Lyman
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00448
Defendant: Cara Delozier, Rory Herrera, Danielle Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Marshall Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lyman et al
as 2:2016cv00193
Plaintiff: Ryan Joseph Davis
Defendant: Paul D. Lyman, Leo Kannez and Dale Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv00091
Plaintiff: Alexandro Lyman
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Andrea Kever and Phemonia L Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv02086
Plaintiff: Alexandro Lyman
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Phemonia L Miller and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2015cv01743
Petitioner: Gary Lyman
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv02618
Petitioner: Thomas Lyman Warren
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larkin v. Forensic Health Services, Inc, et al
as 15-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL L. LARKIN
Defendant - Appellee: FORENSIC HEALTH, a subsidiary of Mental Health Management Services, KIM LYMAN, MS LMHC, Clinical Director, LISA TROIANO, MA, Treatment Unit Coordinator and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?