Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Baker v. Reynolds
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Christine M Baker
Defendant:
Zachary P Reynolds and Zachary Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Baker v. Nationwide Financial LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02882
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE M BAKER
Defendant:
Nationwide Financial LLC, Palisade Legal Group, PLLC, Michael Moccia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wallace et al v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Erik Michael Wallace, Montez Lamont Barker and Dallas Murphy-Johnson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, P. Gardner, Sgt. J. Muddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Apple Investors Group, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01035
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M Baker
Defendant:
Sherry D Cox and Apple Investors Group, LLC
Undetermined:
Tom TJ Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker et al v. Cross et al
as 2:2018cv11639
Plaintiff:
Diana Baker and Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Barbara L. Cross, Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods and others
Baker v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv11234
Plaintiff:
Emerald M. Baker
Defendant:
Chantel Rogers, Wanda Woods, Brian Popour and others
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01033
Plaintiff:
William M. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baker v. Baker
as 3:2016cv01445
Petitioner:
Kenneth D. Baker
Respondent:
Brianne M. Baker
Cause Of Action: 22 USC 9001 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
USA v. Baker et al
as 5:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Tina M. Baker, Unknown Spouse of Tina M. Baker, Kentucky Housing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
