Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Butler v. DeWine
as 5:2021cv00963
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Butler
Defendant:
Richard Michael DeWine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Biden
as 5:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Butler
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Karet
as 5:2021cv00981
Defendant:
Laura Shapira Karet
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Jelinek
as 5:2021cv00873
Defendant:
Walter Craig Jelinek
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood, et al
as 17-55341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHAN BROOKS, an individual.(1) as Successor Trustee to the Sireaner Town Send Revocable Living Trust dated 6/22/2004 (irrevocable as of 2/12/2008); as Sole Beneficiary of the Sireaner Townsend Revocable Living Trust dated 6/22/2004 (irrevocable as of 2
Defendant - Appellee:
PACO-MICHELLE ATWOOD, Administrator of the Estate of Sherrell Atwood; individually, CHRISANGELA WALSTON, L'TANYA M. BUTLER and others
Mark Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 16-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK J. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROLAND M. BUTLER, BADGE NUMBER 2922 and MAMMOUA, BADGE NO. 4805
Defendant:
RUFUS STOKES and FAYE PATERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood et al
as 2:2015cv07724
Defendant:
Paco-Michelle Atwood, Paco-Michelle Atwood, L Tanya M Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Stephan Brooks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
