Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Elliott v. Conner et al
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Keisean Elliott
Defendant:
Deputy M. Conner, Deputy Sgt. (f/n/u) Gray and Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Sheriff of Warren County Indiana
as 4:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Gary M Conner and Gary Michael Conner
Respondent:
Sheriff of Warren County Indiana and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. State of Indiana et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gary M Conner
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Bill Brooks, Don Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
GARY M. CONNER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, BILL BROOKS, DON MUNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. Department of Corrections of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05284
Plaintiff:
Myron G Brandon
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of Washington, Stephen Sinclair, John L Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Youker et al
as 3:2021cv00010
Defendant:
A. Gifford, K. Spry, J. Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
John M. Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TORAN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00066
Defendant:
ANNE M. CONNER, SAMUEL BYRD, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPLER v. SAMUEL et al
as 2:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY CAPLER, JR.
Defendant:
ANNE M. CONNER, MARY RANKIN, REGINA J. ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crichlow v. Fischer et al
as 9:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Daniel Baver, Chief Medical Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
