Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
ROWE v. USAA INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
JAYMEE ROWE and JAYMEE M. ROWE
Defendant:
USAA INSURANCE AGENCY INC and USAA INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Kaleel Hinton
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Mr. Gourley, Mr. Dickie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Sarah Rowe v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-35590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH M. ROWE
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman M. Rowe M.D. of New Jersey et al v. Cigna Healthcare Inc.
as 1:2023cv05208
Plaintiff:
NORMAN M. ROWE M.D. OF NEW JERSEY and EAST COAST PLASTIC SURGERY PLLC
Defendant:
Cigna Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rowe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05116
Plaintiff:
Sarah M Rowe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
