Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Harris v. Janson et al
as 2:2023cv06916
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'neal Harris
Defendant:
Warden S. Janson, Officer P. Davis, R&D Officer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wall v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Lt. J. Kiser, A. Gallihar, W. Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Unit Manager Thompson, Unit Manager Danford, Unit Manager Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Warden S. Jansen et al
as 9:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Johnson
Defendant:
Warden S. Jansen, Warden Phelps, L. Newcombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Taylor v. Yancey et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Yancey, W. J. Lassiter and Dr. Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv01920
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Taylor
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Donat Porter v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General of North Carolina, ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed
Donat Porter v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1094
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ROMINGER, BENJAMIN G. GOFF, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
King v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Bock, Lemely, Devon M. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Laron King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
