Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sophia Pheap v. City of Knoxville, TN, et al
as 22-5169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOPHIA PHEAP, as Administratrix, and Personal Representative of the Estate Of Channara Pheap
Defendant:
CITY OF KNOXVILLE, TN
Defendant / Appellant:
DYLAN M. WILLIAMS
Pheap v. City of Knoxville, et al (PLR3)
as 3:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Eve M Thomas, Dylan M Williams, John & Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Sophea Pheap and Sophia Pheap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2019cv12473
Plaintiff:
JOILYNN WILLIAMS and BILLY M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, JOHN DOE 2, Detroit, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Hamilton County Juvenile Court et al
as 1:2018cv00462
Defendant:
Denise Driehaus, Judge Melissa Powers, Nya Cruse and others
Plaintiff:
Glenda A Smith, T A Jo and Tiffany Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Graham , Sharone Graham , Teaunte Alexander and others
Defendant:
John M Williams, Moira Weir, Genine Menefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
