Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LAPIN et al v. COX et al
as 2:2026cv12333
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LAPIN and MARGARET LAPIN
Defendant:
CARRIE S. COX, ROBERT ESSNER, ALAN EZEKOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
BONDS v. ALDI, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv12222
Plaintiff:
HAWA BONDS
Defendant:
ALDI, INC., ALI SUD, FICTIOUS COMPANIES 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ali et al v. Vohra et al
as 1:2026cv11351
Plaintiff:
Akbar M. Ali, Omar S. Hussain, Umar M. Shakur and others
Defendant:
Sameer Vohra, Mario Treto, Jr. and Terry Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Tata et al
as 4:2026cv07826
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Somasekhar Tata, Mahesh Tata, Anuradha Arcot Chelvaraj and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Afshar v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2026cv08147
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration and Kyle A. Diamantas, J.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 055
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
