Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Armstrong v. McCormack et al
as 7:2015cv03410
Plaintiff:
Gladys M. Armstrong
Defendant:
Brendan P. McCormack, John Does 1-20 and ABC Corporations 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Armstrong
as 2:2014mc51672
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Robin M. Armstrong
Armstrong et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv25976
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Armstrong and Dennis L. Armstrong
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21308
Plaintiff:
Randi M. Armstrong
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Justice v. Kuhnapfel
as 14-1600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brenda Justice, Mother for H.J.
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Kuhnapfel, New York Officer Greg Holme, Judge M. Armstrong and others
Laverne Armstrong, et al v. Michael Maloney, et al
as 14-1571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAVERNE ARMSTRONG, ROBBIN M. ARMSTRONG and CORDERO ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MALONEY, THEIN CHAIKET, BRIGID CARLQUIEST and others
Robert Bishop v. Kelly Harrington, et al
as 14-15145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, M. D. BITER, Warden, J. SOTO and others
Armstrong v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv33417
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Armstrong
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28687
Plaintiff:
Kay M. Armstrong
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2013cv05160
Plaintiff:
Bryan M. Armstrong
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and American Postal Workers Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
