Cases 1 - 10 of 39
G. Rayborn Contracting, LLC. v. Don M. Barron Contractor, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
G. Rayborn Contracting, LLC.
Defendant:
Don M. Barron Contractor, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Associated General Contractors of America Inc et al v. Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Associated General Contractors of America Inc, Louisiana Associated General Contractors Inc, Lincoln Builders Inc and others
Defendant:
Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, Jeffrey A Koses, Joseph R Biden, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Barron v. American Advisors Group et al
as 5:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bernardo M Barron
Defendant:
American Advisors Group, Reverse Mortgage Funding, LLC, American Advisors Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Louis Picart v. USDC-SAC
as 21-71125
Petitioner:
LOUIS RALPH PICART
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LOUIS RALPH PICART and M. BARRON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
BARRON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20161
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M BARRON
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Picart v. M. Barron
as 19-16740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS RALPH PICART
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BARRON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
LYNSEY M. BARRON, AMY TOTENBERG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAAME AMUN RE EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Uzun v. Arris International PLC et al
as 1:2018cv05555
Defendant:
James A. Chiddix, Andrew M. Barron, Debora J. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Uzun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
