Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhoden v. Bryant
as 9:2024cv80219
Plaintiff:
Khalia A Rhoden
Defendant:
Audra M Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST, et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, MR JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwartz v. Ernest et al
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Schwartz and Jason Schwartz
Defendant:
J Ernest, Jackson, Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Andre M. Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mpoy v. The State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, Marcy Waxman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, SIMONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, NIEMAN, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
