Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Anderson v. Waller County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Juan V. Anderson
Defendant:
Waller County Sheriffs Department, David Mace, Detention Officer Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson v. Butts et al
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
Alex M Butts, Tim Henson and Ryan Donovon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juan Anderson v. Alex Butts
as 22-1657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN V. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. BUTTS
Anderson v. Butts
as 1:2021cv06229
Plaintiff:
Juan V. Anderson
Defendant:
Alex M. Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butts v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Defendant:
LM General Insurance Company and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn M. Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Drieu v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02353
Plaintiff:
Michael Drieu
Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc., Kelly Steckelberg and Eric S. Yuan
Petitioner:
Adam M. Butt, Lawrence Jarnes, Michael Bens and others
Muhammad Butt v. Kroll Factual Data, Inc., et al
as 19-1750
Defendant / Appellee:
FD HOLDINGS, LLC, dba Factual Data
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD M. BUTT
Defendant:
KROLL FACTUAL DATA, INC., dba Factual Data and CBCINNOVIS, INC.
Butt v. Kroll Factual Data, Inc., et al.
as 2:2018cv13641
Defendant:
KROLL FACTUAL DATA, INC., d/b/a FACTUAL DATA, Kroll Factual Data, Inc., CBCINNOVIS, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad M Butt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Butts v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03703
Plaintiff:
Eddie M Butts
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
