Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Fourth Judicial District Court, The et al
as 1:2019cv01531
Defendant:
M. Conroy, Attorney General, Fourth Judicial District Court, The and others
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. McHenry et al
as 1:2019cv01026
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Fourth Judicial District Court State of Colorado, The, McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOKS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv05507
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KEVIN M. CONROY, WARDEN DAVID BARNE and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAW v. REILLY et al
as 2:2016cv05335
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAW
Defendant:
JOHN A. REILLY, JR., KEVIN M. CONROY, DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF PRISON INSPECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Temple v. Willie Johnson
as 11-6042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. TEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE JOHNSON, Chief of the City of Geenville Department of Police, BRENDA S. BINNS, Judge, RALPH PUTNAM, Judge and others
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY and TANIESHA NICOLE WILLIAMS
Temple v. Greenville County et al
as 3:2009cv02655
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Temple
Defendant:
Greenville County, Willie Johnson, Brenda S Binns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Thomas Conroy v. Craig Fizer, et al
as 09-16622
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS M. CONROY
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG FIZER and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Davis v. Monts et al
as 3:2009cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Joyce Monts, M A Lawson, T M Conroy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conroy v. Fizer et al
as 2:2007cv02474
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Conroy
Respondent:
Craig Fizer and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
