Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Irvin Tatum v. T. Puget, et al
as 12-15821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVIN T. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PUGET, D. BRADBURY, R. COX and others
Defendant:
D. MARVIN, M. COOK and J. HIRAI
Cook v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv06581
Plaintiff:
Scott Troy Cook
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, F. Juaquez, G. D. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel, et al
as 11-17587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden, DARREN BRADBURY, Captain, M. SMELOSKY, Associate Warden and others
Mosley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
Antonio McGhee
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, et al v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00838
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Merrimack County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
Shaun M. Cook
Defendant:
Nancy Gallagher, William Griffin, Robert Hage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrera v. Lewis et al
as 4:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Chris C. Ferrera
Defendant:
G. D. Lewis, M. Cook, Luense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail et al
as 7:2010cv00499
Defendant:
Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail, Mrs. Battle, Colonel Beauford and others
Plaintiff:
Iris M. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Standley
as 3:2010cv03183
Plaintiff:
Randy M Cook
Defendant:
Kevin Standley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
