Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Evans v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kelly M. Evans
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Steven Evans v. Linda Sander
as 14-2187
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven M. Evans
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Linda Sanders
Evans v. USA
as 6:2014cv03232
Movant:
Steven M Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Steven Evan
as 13-2417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven M. Evans
Harold Hobbs v. Larry May, et al
as 13-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harold Hobbs
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry May, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, M. Evans, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Defendant:
W. Strong, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Outlaw, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Williams, Major, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Jeffrey Ratchford, et al v. Gladys Evans, et al
as 12-3843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey Scott Ratchford, Charles E. Butler, Robert R. Heffernan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Gladys M. Evans, Program Specialist, Varner Unit, ADC, Barbara Smallwood, Business Manager, Varner Unit, ADC, James Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC and others
United States of America v. Evans
as 6:2012cv03495
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven M Evans
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hobbs v. May et al
as 2:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Harold Hobbs
Defendant:
Larry May, M Evans, W Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
