Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Herman et al v. Cataphora, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv04965
Plaintiff:
Russ M. Herman and Arnold Levin
Defendant:
Cataphora, Inc. and Roger Chadderdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Herman et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23351
Plaintiff:
Bernadette P. Herman and Thomas M. Herman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daker v. Dawes et al
as 1:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, Mark Anthony Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Herman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv50251
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Applen, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 4:2012cv01818
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
David D. Applen , Linda K. Bennett , Bobby G. Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herman et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 0:2012cv60426
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Robert M Herman and Sonja E Herman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0075
Herman et al v. Cataphora, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Russ M Herman and Arnold Levin
Defendant:
Cataphora, Inc. and Roger Chadderdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Vioxx Prod Liability, et al
as 11-30792
Appellant:
BRANCH LAW FIRM
Appellee:
RUSS M HERMAN, LEONARD ARTHUR DAVIS, STEPHEN JAY HERMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
