Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
DERICKA ANDERSON
Defendant:
TROOPER M JOHNSON, FIRST SGT J NASH, TROOPER C RIDENHOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2022ct03041
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Scarantino, Warden Ramo, Asst. Warden Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Carmon, et al.
as 5:2020ct03360
Defendant:
FNU Strickland, FNU Pagan, FNU Sherman and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Carmon, et al.
as 3:2020cv00486
Defendant:
FNU Strickland, FNU Pagan, FNU Sherman and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Adcock et al
as 5:2019ct03329
Defendant:
Karen M. Johnson, Assistant Warden Bennett, C/O Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2019cv00945
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
OFFICER ENGLISH, OFFICER M. JOHNSON and OFFICER COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chick et al v. Johnson
as 3:2018cv00572
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lightbody and Nathan Chick
Defendant:
James M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
United States v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America (USA)
Defendant:
Francis M. Johnson, Nathalie Elizabeth Pate Johnson Morse, Elizabeth Pate Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
