Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01151
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kelly L. Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arevalo v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2026cv13516
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lee Arevalo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Prather v. NaphCare inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Kelli Prather
Defendant:
NaphCare inc., Sarah Jackson and Alicia Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metzler v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03369
Plaintiff:
Kelly Metzler
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00336
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Owens v. Kelly et al
as 2:2026cv02965
Plaintiff:
Shayvone Owens
Defendant:
Kelly, Bravo, Lung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Kumar et al
as 5:2026cv04071
Plaintiff:
Kelli Williams
Defendant:
Kumar Virender, Garniel Logistics, Inc and Elite Load, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kelly v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv11294
Plaintiff:
Delores Kelly
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barwick v. Eklund et al
as 3:2026cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Barwick
Defendant:
Ben Eklund, Kelly Martin and Eddie Cathey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
