Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Lee v. Management & Training Corp.
as 3:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
James M. Lee
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadeed et al v. Green et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andre Smoot Shadeed, Edward J. Walker, Jr., Muwakkil S. Shabazz and others
Defendant:
T. Green, Lt. Wright, M. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonny Mitchell v. K. Seibel et al
as 5:2017cv00341
Respondent:
D. Benetiz, L Burns, M Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Sonny Mitchell
Witkin v. Lee et al
as 2:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
M. Lee, E. Arnold, C. Alipaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Seibel et al
as 3:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Sonny Mitchell
Defendant:
K. Seibel, D. Benetiz, L. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Lee v. NE Department of Corr. Service, et al
as 16-3998
Petitioner - Appellant:
Donald M. Lee
Respondent - Appellee:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Scott Frakes, Department of Correction and Unknown Prison Official
Lee, Anthony et al v. Parshall, Heath et al
as 3:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Lee
Defendant:
Heath Parshall, John Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Arana, et al.
as 2:2016cv01630
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
J. Arana, J. Fannon, M. Goldy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hampton v. J. Curiel et al
as 2:2016cv04602
Defendant:
P. Bowen, P.M. Carranza, J. Curiel and others
Plaintiff:
James Hampton
Lee v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Service et al
as 4:2016cv03058
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Service and Unknown Prison Official
Petitioner:
Donald M. Lee
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
