Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harpo-Brown v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv03848
Defendant:
Robert McBurney, McMickle, Kurey & Branch, LLP, Che Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01744
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Duquette Matthews v. City of Toledo, et al
as 17-3089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DUQUETTE M. MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF TOLEDO, Toledo Police Department and TODD BABCOCK, #2232, individually and as employee of the city
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, whose present name remains unknown, individually and as employee of the city
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1412
Taylor v. County of Wayne et al
as 5:2016cv10466
Plaintiff:
Willie James Taylor
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , Benny N. Napoleon , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthews v. City of Toledo
as 3:2015cv00665
Plaintiff:
Duquette M. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Toledo , Randy Pepitone , Todd Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD et al v. REED et al
as 1:2014cv01072
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BYRD and JOHN A. BYRD
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE and M. MATTHEW REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PS) Chipman v. Nelson et al
as 2:2011cv02770
Plaintiff:
Rickie Chipman- PROSE E-FILER
Defendant:
Marcia F. Nelson, Enloe Medical Center, Joseph M. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
