Cases 11 - 20 of 56
IN RE AT&T/DIRECTTV NOW SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv02892
Defendant:
Richard W. Fisher, Cynthia B. Taylor, John J. Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Lead Plaintiff:
Evan Hassiotis, Martin J. Boot, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds and others
Petitioner:
KBC Asset Management NV and Pro-Alpha Investments Limited
Kennedy v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01317
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Defendant:
EY, Pillsbury, William E. Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHELTON v. NATIONAL STUDENT ASSIST LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02545
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
NATIONAL STUDENT ASSIST LLC , NIR J. GOLDIN , LIBERTY FINANCIAL USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Swisher v. Roche et al
as 6:2016cv01241
Plaintiff:
Miriah M Swisher
Defendant:
David M. Roche and Myrtle M. Roche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roche v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2015cv01366
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Beatrice M. Roche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roche v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05329
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Roche
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roche et al v. Gambee et al
as 1:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
LaMar Roche and Sherri M. Roche
Defendant:
Kent Gambee, Leandra Gambee, David Gambee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk Williams v. State of California, et al
as 12-16603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Bryant Allen v. S. Roche, et al
as 12-16133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYANT ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
S. M. ROCHE, Chief Medical Officer and T. FELKER, Warden
Alex Ross v. A. David, et al
as 12-15775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX DEON ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAVID
Defendant:
D. SWINGLE, S. M. ROCHE and T. DEWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
