Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Arcadio Acuna v. Lea Ann Chrones, et al
as 09-15239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADIO S. ACUNA
Defendant - Appellee:
LEA ANN CHRONES, E. ALAMEIDA, J.S. WOODFORD and others
Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Throop
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Throop v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv02109
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Throop
Defendant:
Secretary of Corrections, Larry Scribner, Mark Bourland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ruff et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2008gd50338
Plaintiff:
Connie M. Ruff and Ralph Ruff
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Inc., Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dorrough v. Ruff et al
as 1:2008cv01366
Plaintiff:
Michael Reed Dorrough
Defendant:
M. Ruff, Everett W. Fischer, T. L. Rosenkrans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manriquez v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv02427
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valley v. Tilton, et al
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Valley
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, A. J. Malfi, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorrough v. Ruff
as 1:2007cv01771
Petitioner:
Michael Reed Dorrough
Respondent:
M. Ruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Marquez et al
as 3:2007cv05380
Plaintiff:
James Douglas
Defendant:
R. S. Marquez, M. Ruff, Daniel L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baughman et al v. Lee County, Miss.
as 1:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
Melanie L. Baughman, David Biffle, Katarshish Bobo and others
Defendant:
Lee County, Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
