Cases 21 - 30 of 279
Smith v. Lutz et al
as 2:2022cv02793
Plaintiff:
Cameron M Smith
Defendant:
Matthew Lutz, Brice Swiney, Mark Fleegle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Hill et al
as 7:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christine Barnette
Defendant:
Daniel Hill, Sarah Thompson and Daniel M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
William David Fain
Defendant:
Sherriff Daniel M. Smith, RN Daniel Hill, Lt. Nick Pennelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Leu et al
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Leu, Ms. Carmona and Mrs. Essex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Klein et al v. City of Sedalia, Missouri et al
as 2:2022cv04049
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Klein and James Kohrs
Defendant:
City of Sedalia, Missouri, Kelvin Shaw, Pettis County, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Smith
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terrell Fisher
Defendant:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Noonan et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jesus Pedrito Gonzales
Defendant:
E. Noonan, M. Smith, R. Stewert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Virgil v. Barrett et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Virgil M. Smith
Defendant:
Barrett and Woltgen
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
