Cases 1 - 10 of 56
J M SMITH CORPORATION et al v. INMAR RX SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
J M SMITH CORPORATION doing business as SMITH DRUG COMPANY and BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
INMAR RX SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. ATRIUM HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. SMITH
Defendant:
ATRIUM HEALTH, NORTHEAST MEDICAL CENTER, WHITLEY ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Cathy M. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Whitaker v. Smith
as 5:2023hc02046
Petitioner:
Lance Whitaker
Respondent:
Donna M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03009
Defendant:
John Herring, Marvin Casino and Chineta Williams
Plaintiff:
Vernon M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohr, Jr et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sooner Ventures LLC, Timothy Hill, Tonja Vaughn and others
Defendant:
E.I. duPont Chemical Corporation, Michael E Johnson, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
