Cases 41 - 50 of 412
(PC)Cox v. Bal et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
I. Bal, M. Williams and T. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams v. Ron Neal
as 22-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL M. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Muran et al
as 1:2022cv03008
Plaintiff:
Tearre M. Williams
Defendant:
Kelly Muran, Judge N. Ross and Steven Hoffner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00292
Petitioner:
Michael M Williams
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
M. Williams and EBRPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Williams v. Gigi Matteson
as 2:2022cv00671
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Williams
Respondent:
Gigi Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
WARREN K MARTIN
Defendant:
M WILLIAMS, A PARKER, A DAVINGSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Derek v. Schultz, Michael et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Williams
Defendant:
Michael J. Schultz and Stacey A. Tilot
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2021cv01334
Plaintiff:
Derek M Williams
Defendant:
Warden Scott Eckstein, John Kind, William Swiekatowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
