Cases 1 - 10 of 3,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bronson v. Leduc
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
MSj. Mcp, QMHP Howard F Bronson
Defendant:
MA, LADC Greg Leduc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Dixon v. Taqueria LA 20 LLC, et al.
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Madeleine Dixon
Defendant:
Taqueria LA 20 LLC d/b/a MUCHO MAS and Shawn Toups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Roycroft, et al
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
IAN MILLER, personal representative of the Estate of Robert Joseph Miller
Defendant:
SPENCER JACKSON, in his individual capacity, TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MA and SEAN ROYCROFT, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez Infante, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2338
Petitioner:
GERTRUDIS LOPEZ INFANTE, MA CONSUELO MACIAS LOPEZ, MARIA LETICIA MACIAS LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Re: Searson
as 24-8012
Respondent:
WILLIAM SEARSON
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
